Harmonizing Ouster Clauses and Pre-action Protocols in Nigerian Construction Disputes

¹Dike Ifunanya Elizabeth and ²Nnadi Ezekiel Oluwaseun Ejiofor

¹School of Law, Politics and Sociology, University of Sussex, UK.

²Civil Engineering Department, Kampala International University, Uganda.

Corresponding author: Nnadi Ezekiel, nnadiezekiel@kiu.ac.ug

ABSTRACT

This paper discusses how ouster clauses and pre-action protocols intersect when it comes to resolving construction disputes within the Nigerian context. Concerning dispelling ambiguity and providing sureness, ouster clauses point out ways of dispute resolution mechanisms. On the other hand, early resolution and cost saving can be encouraged through dialogue or cooperation before formal litigation thereby being said as the role of pre-action protocols in promoting such response before justice is sought. It is important to understand how these factors interrelate so that we can manage construction disputes effectively. While ouster clauses might influence when pre-action protocols are applied, they may also determine how parties understand and observe such provisions. Nigeria’s legal system as far as construction disputes are concerned, should be managed to maintain a harmonious balance between the two mechanisms. The interdependencies of the entities involved in this process are explored here and the aim is to provide information that could be useful for those practicing law or those responsible for making decisions in other areas The effectiveness of ouster clauses and pre-action protocols in construction disputes is assessed based on factors like resolution speed with a weighted mean of 2.53, legal enforcement (2.49), compliance rate (2.35), cost reduction (2.21). Ouster clauses limit the jurisdiction of courts or arbitrators by 34%, leading to prolonged litigation or arbitration (23%). Pre-action protocols impose procedural requirements (18%), causing delays and increased costs (16%). To improve the effectiveness of ouster clauses and pre-action protocols in construction disputes, it is crucial to enhance clarity, promote alternative dispute resolution, facilitate early engagement, strengthen enforcement mechanisms, and engage stakeholders.

Keywords: Construction disputes, Litigation, Ouster clauses, Pre-action protocols, Resolution.

CITE AS: Dike Ifunanya Elizabeth and Nnadi Ezekiel Oluwaseun Ejiofor (2024). Harmonizing Ouster Clauses and Pre-action Protocols in Nigerian Construction Disputes. NEWPORT INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CURRENT ISSUES IN ARTS AND MANAGEMENT,4(2):45-49. https://doi.org/10.59298/NIJCIAM/2024/4.2.74549